Who S The Real Terrorist

In the movie they make strong cables on what errors is and who argon the terrorist. The word picture does indeed reach its audience and professionalvides a clear message. Ethos The schoolroom debate gibe doesnt introduce anybody however it does repoint credibility threw start the video and uses well cognise actors. The scene in itself shows a spread of credibility ultimately because it is set up as a classroom discussion, setting. The instructor also shows he knows what he is talking about alone because he is throwing out data with numbers pool. Ultimately numbers makes anything to a greater extent believable and sometimes veritable(a) more believable.The student who is shown on the video who is support the Muslims is a Hindu actor named, Ivies Oberon. While the professor is a well- known star named USAF All Kahn. The rest of the classes are random pro American actors that no one really knows. The audience impart mechanically agree with the famous and well-known actor s. Whereas with the random students who the audience isnt familiar with them will most likely disagree with them. For instance companies use this strategy. They use business office models and well known celebrities. For example Lebanon James a well-known basketball player is sponsored by Nikkei, McDonalds, and Coca-Cola.The Meanys intention is tar find in that respect audience and foreshorten there point across. Considering there point being that if, Lebanon James chow or wears this so should you. Thats how they attempted to manipulate there targeted audience and get their message across just like in the Exurban debate scene. This automatically gives the actors more credibility in the sense that they actually know what theyre talking about unlike the underground actors, consequently takes away their credibility. As a result the actors being used can make their telephone line stronger and credible.Logos The video scene begins when the teacher states that Islam is a religion tha t reaches peace and tolerates (Exurban-Classroom Debate Scene, . 32 seconds). As soon as the instructor finishes one of the students exclaims if Islam truly is a religion that preaches peace how come they have the worlds most trouble descry like the west bank, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iran there all plagued with Islamic terrorism. (Exurban-Crisscross Debate Scene, . 37 seconds). The student uses a faulty deduction in here statement, she uses composition.She is assumptive that all terrorist are Muslims by generalizing that the world most trouble floater are all thanks to Islamic terrorism. Threw UT the movie scene there is quite a lot of perspicuous appeal. The video shows its transparent appeal in various ways. They persuade the audience by exposing the unite States and claiming that the US is only in the Middle East for the oil and that the Taliban was a creation of the CIA in other words it can be characterized as a lie since there really is no proof or it can also be an appeal to anonymous authority.Despite that, the video gives numbers and compare how more people die in Afghanistan bombardment than in 9-1 1 . The student compares how much people have died in Afghanistan bombing being which as more than 15,000 while 9-1 1 had around 3000. The logical appeal is clearly valid and effective to the audience since they support their statements and fork out information. To sum it up at the end of the video the student even ends with logical appeal by stating that just because there elites and wear a fancy suit doesnt make them any different than other terrorist.This must have been one of the strongest logical appeal that one of the students states. It makes the audience salmagundi of remove that blind fold that the government has had them have on. It changes the perspective and in a way makes the targeted audience open there eyes. Pathos The excited appeal is clear throughout the video. You can see the fire in the student who argues how Americans a re the real terrorist oppose to the other students who are against the Islam religion, they show an expression of being worn out of the argument.The student showing his anger convinces the audience in the way of how tired he is of Americans showing there hypocrisy on how the terrorist are Islam religion. While the student who are expressing themselves as worn out help out the argument even more by showing how he has exposed them, which truly will preserve the audiences . The video ends with the pro Muslim student showing his anger. His expression makes it tint like all Muslims are fed up with Americans stepping in their disgrace and taking advantage and just bombing there country.The student makes the argument more emotional and appealing as well as the deject background music. Conclusion In conclusion the movie scene cover the three different rhetorical strategies by either supporting its argument or not making it weaker. The artifact does indeed reach its decision in persuadi ng and convincing its audience since its argument is based on facts. The video mainly mention on owe the US was bad and are terrorist and gave little information on how Muslims are also terrorist.