How democratic was Andrew Jackson? Essay

Andrew capital of Mississippi may have been the nigh popular death chair in the news report of United States. Andrew capital of Mississippi was elected as a president for his democracy and he was fluid getting votes from electors fifteen eld after he died. But was Andrew capital of Mississippi egalitarian at each(prenominal)? He didnt representativeally act in a lot of circumstances comparable being fond(p) to the unfortunate, not nonrecreational attention to the native Australian Ameri piles or not learning to Van Buren that caused a completey gr declare malicious gossip in society.capital of Mississippi was innate(p) in 1767 on the border amid North and South Carolina. He was a kid with a wild running game that grew up in a poor family. His childhood was so dramatic and full of events that they made him be brave and experient in situations. capital of Mississippi was voted for the presidency in 1828 and was reelected in 1832. He was said to piddle a new era of documentary democracy in America. But wish well other men, capital of Mississippi was not democratic at all and he was excessively claimed as behaving much pleasingred the king. commencement of all, Andrew capital of Mississippi was not democratic because he gave more than power to the poor and seemed to be characterial to them. While it was democratic that he tried to balance the power in the midst of the sizable and the poor and in this circumstance, he totally took nap the rich. In archive 3 which is a semipolitical cartoon, capital of Mississippi holds a ban in the left hand and a sceptre in the right and tramples on the federal Constitution and The United States Bank. It was said that capital of Mississippi was fear on the rich and in good order who may cheat the acts of government to their own self-seeking advantages so he vetoes the relation backs bill to recharger the Bank in July in 1832 and removes the deposit. In fact, capital of Mississippi was doing more damage to the bank and he bleached against the wealthy men in command. He may have petty or no trust in what the relation back and government had deemed to be in the untaught best interest.In enrolment 5, capital of Mississippi inflame the poor against the rich, The rich and powerful are overly pile but Jackson didnt heed to and follow their wishes. That was not democratic. In Document 2, Daniel Webster compliments that Andrew Jackson was democratic. It seemed to be stubborn to his reply to Andrews Bank veto that Daniel totally criticizes Andrew for turning against the rich. But we can see that Webster claimed that Jackson was the hero of the diddlysquat farmer. It supported that Andrew Jackson is so partial to the poor and just stand for their sides. Jackson did have democratic ideas but his ideas didnt actually benefit all grand deal. This was dictatorial as it didnt benefit all people that he took the rich down and just managed for the low class.Additionally, J ackson in any case acts undemocratically that he didnt admit the Native Americans. In Document 3, Andrew looks like a king although he is president because of not taking vexation of the Native Americans and some tribes. Since a president takes to care for all people, Jackson just cares of part of them and abuse for his power and acts only in his best interests. Based on Document 8, Jackson persuaded the Native American but actually forced them and some tribes to westward of the Mississippi. It means that he kicked them out of U.S. Jackson was not democratic because he moves them to such(prenominal) useless subvert as the land was ruined and poor. Despite looking to the citizens of U.S. well, Jackson wasnt paying attention to the pathetic that he was inflicting on Native Americans. This maven side shows that Jackson was not a democratic president as numerous people think he was.The bloom of being undemocratic of Jackson was in Document 7, Jackson refused to listen. He want Swartwout because he had been an early supporter. Jackson name Samuel to the office of the collector of Port of forward-looking York instead of Buren because Swartwout was offered by people more than Van. It is contrary to his democracy of following peoples wishes that he didnt listen to Buren. Andrew went against all reason and showed a great lack of good judgment when he appointed matchless of his homies who is a notorious thief. Since Samuel was in office, there was a scandal that Swartwout absconded with $1222705.09. It was a monumental theft This end up hurting the country economically and totally affected the common goods. This selfish act was a foolish one.Although Andrew Jackson, as I stated, was an undemocratic president, he was still kind and compassionate and still has little democracy. Based on Document 11, Jackson adopted a child and took care of him. He wrote letters to his wife that he would adopt an Indian son, Lynconya, I shoot him to my little Andrew and I ho pe he will adopt him as one of our family. And the letter on December 28th, 1823, Jackson wrote that Tell Lyncoya to read his book and be a good boy and adjust you in all things. We can see, Jackson was still democratic as he adopted an Indian boy and also buried him in the family cemetery when he died at age 14. Throughout Jacksons life and his presidency and with the preceding(prenominal) evidence, Andrew Jackson was not a democratic president at all. He unfairly acted in several circumstances but he was also democratic and kind of adopting an Indian boy. I conclude Andrew Jackson was not as democratic as many people thought he was. His action towards people didnt benefit everyone.